Top Anonymous Cryptocurrencies Leading Privacy in 2026

Sandro Brasher

Blog

November 6, 2025

2 Views

Last month, something surprising happened: over 78% of blockchain transactions now go through surveillance checkpoints. That’s not a future warning—it’s happening right now in 2026. Every crypto transfer you make is probably being watched.

I’ve followed privacy coins since 2019, and things have changed a lot. What began as a small concern for tech fans is now a mainstream need. Financial privacy isn’t about hiding—it’s about keeping basic freedom in a watched world.

The top anonymous cryptocurrencies have grown beyond simple hiding. Monero improved its ring signatures. Zcash enhanced its zero-knowledge proofs.

Dash made its mixing protocols better. What really changed is pressure from everywhere—regulators want more rules while users want stronger anonymity guarantees.

I’m noticing adoption patterns nobody predicted three years ago. Anonymous blockchain technology isn’t just for privacy fans anymore. It’s becoming essential infrastructure.

Key Takeaways

• Over 78% of blockchain transactions now face surveillance monitoring in 2026
• Privacy coins have evolved from niche tools to essential infrastructure for financial autonomy
• Monero, Zcash, and Dash have significantly upgraded their anonymity protocols
• Regulatory pressures are intensifying while user demand for privacy continues growing
• Anonymous blockchain technology is gaining mainstream adoption beyond traditional privacy advocates
• Real-world use cases for privacy coins have expanded dramatically since 2023

Introduction to Anonymous Cryptocurrencies

I’ve spent years watching the cryptocurrency space evolve. One thing has become crystal clear: anonymity means different things to different people. Some folks think Bitcoin offers complete privacy.

Others understand that true crypto anonymity requires sophisticated technology working behind the scenes. The confusion is understandable. It’s important to get the basics straight before diving deeper.

The landscape of secure digital currencies has matured considerably since the early days. What started as experimental projects has grown into a legitimate sector. These projects now address real privacy concerns.

Bitcoin trades around $102,000 and Ethereum near $3,300 in 2026. Mainstream acceptance of cryptocurrency has paradoxically increased demand for genuine financial privacy solutions.

What Anonymous Cryptocurrencies Actually Mean

Let me break down what we’re really talking about with cryptocurrency privacy. True anonymity in crypto involves concealing three critical elements: transaction details, wallet balances, and participant identities. This is fundamentally different from what Bitcoin offers.

Bitcoin provides pseudonymity, not anonymity. Think of it like writing under a pen name. People might not immediately know who you are.

If someone connects your pen name to your real identity, everything becomes traceable. That’s exactly how Bitcoin works.

Blockchain analysis companies can trace most Bitcoin transactions with surprising accuracy. I’ve seen cases where investigators linked wallet addresses to real people. They used exchange deposits, IP addresses, or transaction timing patterns.

Privacy coins operate on an entirely different principle. They’re designed from the ground up to make transactions untraceable. This distinction cannot be overstated, especially as financial surveillance becomes more sophisticated.

Privacy is not about hiding bad things. It’s about protecting everything that makes us human—our choices, our beliefs, our relationships, and our dignity in an increasingly transparent world.

The need for financial privacy extends beyond cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Businesses protecting trade secrets need privacy. Individuals in oppressive regimes require it.

Everyday people who simply value their personal autonomy have legitimate reasons to seek transaction privacy. Anonymous cryptocurrencies provide a tool for maintaining that privacy without requiring technical expertise.

How Privacy Works in Blockchain Technology

The technical mechanisms enabling crypto anonymity are fascinating. I promise to explain them without requiring a computer science degree. Let’s look at the main blockchain privacy protocols that make secure digital currencies possible.

Ring signatures are like having a group of people sign a document. No one can tell which specific person actually signed it. Your transaction gets mixed with several other possible signers.

Observers know someone in the group made the transaction. They can’t determine who. Here’s a real-world analogy: Imagine ten people walking into separate changing rooms with identical outfits.

They all come out wearing the same thing. You know one of them brought a particular item. You can’t identify which person it was.

Stealth addresses work differently. Every time someone sends you funds, a unique, one-time address gets generated. It’s like having a new PO Box created automatically for each piece of mail.

Even if someone knows your main address, they can’t see your incoming transactions.

Zero-knowledge proofs represent perhaps the most elegant solution. They allow you to prove something is true without revealing any information about it. You can verify a transaction is valid without exposing the sender, receiver, or amount.

Think of it like proving you’re old enough to buy alcohol without showing your exact birthdate. The verification happens. Unnecessary information stays private.

These technologies can work independently or combine for enhanced protection. Different privacy coins implement various combinations. This depends on their specific design philosophy and performance requirements.

The Current State of Privacy Cryptocurrencies

The cryptocurrency market in 2026 looks dramatically different from even two years ago. Mainstream adoption has brought both opportunities and challenges for those seeking transaction privacy.

Bitcoin hovers around six figures and institutional investment becomes commonplace. Regulatory scrutiny has intensified significantly. Governments worldwide are implementing stricter Know Your Customer requirements.

Centralized exchanges now collect extensive personal information. They create detailed profiles of user behavior.

This regulatory environment has created a strange paradox. As cryptocurrency becomes more accepted, it simultaneously becomes more surveilled. The original vision of financial sovereignty feels increasingly distant.

Privacy coins have responded by maturing from fringe experiments into sophisticated financial tools. Development teams have refined their technologies. They improved user experiences and built robust ecosystems.

The community around anonymous transactions has grown beyond early adopters. It now includes mainstream users who value financial privacy.

I’ve noticed three major trends shaping the privacy coin landscape:

• Regulatory pressure: Some exchanges have delisted privacy coins, while others have embraced them with proper compliance frameworks
• Technical advancement: Privacy protocols have become more efficient, reducing transaction costs and confirmation times
• Growing awareness: More people understand that financial privacy isn’t about criminality—it’s about human dignity

The market capitalization of leading privacy coins has fluctuated with regulatory news and technological developments. However, the fundamental demand for cryptocurrency privacy continues growing. People recognize the implications of permanent, public financial records.

Traditional financial systems offered privacy by default. Your neighbor couldn’t see your bank balance or spending patterns. Blockchain technology reversed this model, making everything public by default.

Privacy coins restore that original expectation of financial confidentiality. They maintain the benefits of decentralized systems.

Looking at adoption patterns, I see increasing interest from users in countries with unstable currencies. I also see interest from those in authoritarian governments. Growth is happening in developed nations too.

People simply want to maintain the same privacy expectations they had with cash transactions.

The conversation around secure digital currencies has shifted. It moved from “why would anyone need this?” to “how can we implement this responsibly?” That evolution represents significant progress in public understanding of cryptocurrency privacy’s legitimate purposes.

Leading Anonymous Cryptocurrencies in 2026

Privacy coins aren’t all created equal. Some deliver on their promises while others just talk a good game. After years tracking these assets, I’ve learned that technology matters as much as marketing claims.

The three cryptocurrencies I’m covering have proven themselves through consistent development. They show real-world usage and genuine commitment to protecting user privacy.

What separates these leaders from the pack isn’t just their technology. It’s their approach to solving the problem of financial surveillance. Each has taken a different path.

Monero: The Pioneer of Privacy Coins

I’ll be straight with you—monero crypto has remained the gold standard for privacy since 2014. Unlike other projects, Monero enforces privacy by default on every single transaction. You can’t accidentally expose your financial history because the protocol doesn’t give you that choice.

The technical magic happens through three key technologies working together. Ring signatures mix your transaction with others automatically. This makes it impossible to trace which input actually funded a payment.

Stealth addresses create one-time destination addresses for each transaction. Nobody can link multiple payments to your wallet just by looking at the blockchain.

Then there’s RingCT, which stands for Ring Confidential Transactions. This technology hides the amount being sent while allowing network validators to confirm the math. The beauty is that it all happens behind the scenes.

You don’t need a PhD in cryptography to use monero crypto securely. What I appreciate most about Monero is its refusal to compromise. Every transaction gets mixed with at least 15 others as of 2026.

This creates a massive anonymity set that makes chain analysis effectively worthless. The downside? Some exchanges have delisted it due to regulatory pressure.

But that’s actually a badge of honor in my book. It means the privacy actually works well enough to concern surveillance advocates.

Zcash: Balancing Transparency and Anonymity

The zcash blockchain takes a fundamentally different approach by giving users a choice. You can send transparent transactions that work like Bitcoin. Or you can use shielded transactions that leverage some seriously impressive cryptography.

This flexibility is both its strength and its weakness, depending on who you ask. The technology behind Zcash’s privacy is called zk-SNARKs. In practical terms, you can prove a transaction is valid without revealing any information.

It’s mathematically provable privacy, which is pretty remarkable. Here’s where things get interesting with the zcash blockchain. Because privacy is optional, users can choose transparency when they need it.

A business might use shielded transactions for competitive reasons but switch to transparent ones for taxes. That versatility has helped Zcash maintain listings on major exchanges where Monero got booted.

The criticism from privacy purists is valid, though. Optional privacy means most users take the easy route and stick with transparent transactions. This creates smaller anonymity sets for those who do use shielded transactions.

By 2026, adoption of shielded transactions has improved significantly. About 65% of transactions now use privacy features, up from around 20% just years ago.

I’ve watched the Zcash community grapple with this trade-off for years. The recent push to make shielded transactions the default shows they’re taking criticism seriously. Whether this flexibility is a feature or bug depends on your use case.

Dash: Private Payments for Everyday Use

The dash cryptocurrency positioned itself differently from the start. It’s not trying to be the most private coin. Rather, it’s the most usable digital cash with privacy features.

That distinction matters more than you might think. Dash’s privacy comes through a feature called PrivateSend, which uses CoinJoin mixing technology. Your transaction gets mixed with others through masternodes before hitting the blockchain.

It’s not as bulletproof as Monero’s always-on privacy or Zcash’s cryptographic approach. But it’s practical and gets the job done for most everyday transactions.

What makes dash cryptocurrency interesting is everything else it brings to the table. InstantSend locks transactions in about two seconds, making it viable for point-of-sale purchases. The masternode network enables features like decentralized governance.

It’s built to function as a payment system first and a privacy tool second. I’ll be honest—Dash sits in a different category than Monero or Zcash. If you’re looking for maximum anonymity against nation-state surveillance, Dash probably isn’t your first choice.

But if you want fast, reasonably private payments with good usability, it makes sense. The privacy-focused digital assets market has room for different approaches. Dash fills the “practical privacy” niche pretty well.

The governance model through masternodes is actually one of Dash’s most underrated features. Unlike many cryptocurrencies where development relies on donations, Dash funds itself through treasury allocations. This has created sustainable, professional development that’s kept the project relevant year after year.

Looking at these three together, you can see how the privacy-focused digital assets space has matured. Each project serves different needs and makes different trade-offs. Monero crypto maximizes privacy at all costs.

The zcash blockchain offers flexibility through optional privacy. And dash cryptocurrency prioritizes usability with reasonable privacy features.

The key is understanding what you actually need. Are you protecting against casual blockchain analysis, serious forensics, or nation-state surveillance? Your answer should guide which of these coins makes sense for your situation.

I’ve found that most people overestimate their privacy needs initially. They then realize that moderate privacy with better usability often serves them better. Maximum anonymity sometimes comes with too much friction.

Key Features of Top Anonymous Cryptocurrencies

I’ve spent countless hours researching how untraceable digital assets actually function. The technology is both fascinating and essential. The difference between cryptocurrencies comes down to specific technical implementations.

These aren’t just buzzwords—they’re actual mechanisms that determine whether your transactions stay private. Without them, your data ends up exposed on a public ledger for anyone to analyze.

What separates leading privacy coins from standard cryptocurrencies involves layers of cryptographic privacy methods. Each layer addresses a different aspect of transaction visibility. Some hide the sender, others obscure the receiver, and the best ones conceal amounts too.

Transaction Obfuscation Techniques

Ring signatures represent one of the most effective ways to hide who sent a transaction. Think of it like a group signing a document together. Observers can verify someone from the group signed it, but can’t determine which specific person.

Monero uses this technique by mixing your transaction with several others. This creates mathematical ambiguity about the true sender.

I find the elegance of this approach remarkable. Your transaction gets bundled with ten or more decoy transactions. All of them look equally valid to outside observers.

The network knows one is real. Determining which one requires information that doesn’t exist on the blockchain.

Stealth addresses take a different approach to privacy. They generate unique, one-time addresses for each transaction. The protocol creates a new address derived from your public key.

This address is impossible to link back without your private view key. This prevents what I call the “address clustering” problem.

In Bitcoin, once someone knows your address, they can track every transaction you’ve ever received. Stealth addresses make each payment look completely unrelated to previous ones.

Zero-knowledge proofs still feel like magic even after studying the mathematics. These allow you to prove you have something without revealing what it is. Zcash pioneered this with zk-SNARKs.

The name is a mouthful, but the concept solves a fundamental problem. Traditional blockchains require transparency for verification. Everyone needs to see transaction details to confirm they’re valid.

Zero-knowledge proofs separate verification from visibility. You prove the transaction is legitimate without exposing sender, receiver, or amount. It’s like proving you’re over 21 without showing your birthdate.

User Shielding and Privacy Enhancements

The protocol-level privacy features mean nothing if the user interface undermines them. I’ve seen too many private tokens fail because their wallets didn’t implement privacy features properly. Many made them optional rather than default.

Zcash offers both transparent and shielded addresses. The shielded ones use zero-knowledge proofs for complete privacy. Transparent addresses work like Bitcoin.

This flexibility sounds good in theory. However, it creates a practical problem. If most users choose transparent addresses for convenience, the shielded pool becomes smaller and potentially less private.

View keys represent an intelligent compromise between total privacy and selective transparency. These allow you to share transaction history with specific parties. You maintain control over who sees what, rather than having an all-or-nothing approach.

Encrypted memos add another layer of functionality. Some privacy protocols allow attached messages that only the sender and receiver can decrypt. This solves the business problem of needing payment references while maintaining privacy.

The weakest link remains user behavior rather than protocol design. Using a privacy coin from an exchange that requires full identity verification partially defeats the purpose. Reusing addresses or linking your wallet to social media can undermine even the strongest cryptographic privacy methods.

Decentralization and Community Governance

Privacy without decentralization provides false security. A cryptocurrency controlled by a small group can’t guarantee long-term privacy. I’ve watched several projects market themselves as private while concentrating power in ways that made guarantees meaningless.

Monero’s approach to mining illustrates this principle well. The project regularly updates its proof-of-work algorithm to resist ASIC miners. By keeping mining accessible to regular computers, Monero maintains a broader, more decentralized network.

This isn’t about being anti-technology. It’s about preventing mining centralization that could compromise privacy.

Zcash faced community pressure regarding its founder rewards structure. Initially, 20% of mining rewards went to the development team and investors. While this funded development, it raised questions about long-term decentralization and governance.

Dash uses a masternode system for governance and additional privacy features. Running a masternode requires holding 1,000 DASH. Masternode operators vote on protocol changes and funding proposals.

This creates a different decentralization model. Not everyone can participate equally, but the barrier prevents completely centralized control.

The table below compares how leading privacy coins implement these essential features:

Understanding these technical differences matters because not all untraceable digital assets offer equivalent protection. Marketing materials might claim “complete privacy,” but the actual implementation determines effectiveness.

A privacy coin that makes anonymity optional represents a different risk profile. One with mandatory, protocol-level privacy and true decentralization offers stronger protection.

The intersection of technical features and governance structure creates the actual privacy guarantee. Strong cryptography protects against outside observers. Decentralization and community governance protect against internal threats and regulatory pressure.

Graph: Growth of Anonymous Cryptocurrencies Over Time

Charts and numbers don’t usually excite me. But the market expansion analysis for privacy coins shows something remarkable happening. The evolution from obscure cypherpunk projects to established financial instruments tells a compelling story.

What we’re witnessing in 2026 represents a fundamental shift. People are rethinking how they view financial privacy.

Historical Growth and Adoption Rates

Monero launched in 2014. The entire privacy coin sector barely registered on anyone’s radar. I remember those early days discussing privacy coin adoption trends with maybe a few hundred dedicated users globally.

The technology was rough. The interfaces were clunky. Most people didn’t see the point.

The first major inflection point came during 2016-2017. Anonymous cryptocurrency growth accelerated as the broader crypto market exploded with mainstream interest. Daily transaction volumes for Monero jumped from around 1,500 in early 2016 to over 9,000 by late 2017.

That’s a 500% increase in practical usage. This wasn’t just speculative trading.

Here’s what most market expansion analysis misses about that period. The growth wasn’t primarily driven by legitimate privacy concerns. It was speculation mixed with darknet market adoption.

Controversial? Sure. But understanding the actual drivers matters if we want accurate historical context.

The 2018-2020 period brought what I call the “maturation phase” of privacy coin adoption trends. Transaction volumes stabilized rather than crashed like many speculative altcoins. Active addresses for major privacy coins grew steadily by 15-20% annually even during the crypto winter.

This indicated genuine utility rather than pure speculation.

Privacy isn’t just a feature anymore—it’s becoming a fundamental requirement for digital money as surveillance increases globally.

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital payment adoption everywhere. Privacy-conscious users started paying more attention. They realized how much financial data companies collected.

From 2020 to 2023, anonymous cryptocurrency growth shifted from underground markets to everyday users. These users were concerned about corporate surveillance.

Major exchanges delisted privacy coins in 2021-2022. This paradoxically strengthened the ecosystem. Users learned to use decentralized exchanges, which actually aligned better with the privacy ethos.

Trading volumes migrated rather than disappeared. This proved the resilience of genuine demand.

By 2024-2025, privacy coin adoption trends showed interesting demographic shifts. Early adopters were tech-savvy libertarians. Newer users included mainstream individuals concerned about financial surveillance.

Small businesses avoiding competitor surveillance represented growing adoption vectors. Previous market expansion analysis had overlooked this.

The current state in 2026 shows mature market conditions. Bitcoin hovering around $102,000 indicates the overall crypto market has moved beyond pure speculation. Privacy coins occupy an established niche with combined market capitalization exceeding $12 billion and daily transaction volumes in the hundreds of thousands.

Future Predictions of Market Expansion

Projecting anonymous cryptocurrency growth requires understanding multiple converging factors. I’ve watched enough crypto predictions fail spectacularly to be cautious. But certain trends seem fairly inevitable given current trajectories.

The implementation of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will likely accelerate privacy coin adoption trends. Governments are rolling out completely surveillable digital money. A significant minority will seek alternatives.

Estimates suggest 5-8% of CBDC-exposed populations will explore privacy alternatives. This creates substantial new user bases.

Regulatory pressure represents the biggest uncertainty in market expansion analysis for privacy coins. Governments increasingly view financial privacy as suspicious rather than legitimate. However, heavy-handed regulation historically drives adoption underground rather than eliminating it.

We’ll probably see continued growth through different channels.

Technological improvements scheduled for 2026-2028 will enhance usability significantly. Faster transaction times, better mobile wallet experiences, and improved integration with decentralized finance platforms remove current friction points. Privacy becomes convenient, and adoption accelerates naturally.

The demographic shift I mentioned earlier will continue expanding. Privacy coin adoption trends show increasing interest from professionals, small business owners, and political activists. These groups have genuine use cases beyond the stereotypical darknet associations that dominated early adoption.

Looking at anonymous cryptocurrency growth projections through 2029, realistic scenarios suggest steady expansion. We won’t see explosive moonshots. The most likely path shows annual growth rates stabilizing around 20-25%.

This will be driven by genuine utility adoption rather than speculative mania.

Geographic expansion represents an underappreciated factor in market expansion analysis. Countries experiencing currency crises or increased financial surveillance show disproportionate interest in privacy solutions. Venezuela, Turkey, Nigeria, and several Southeast Asian nations demonstrate this pattern already.

The institutional adoption question remains contentious. Traditional finance won’t embrace privacy coins openly. But corporate treasury departments quietly exploring alternatives create interesting dynamics.

Businesses concerned about competitor surveillance or operating in sensitive industries represent potential adoption vectors. This could significantly impact privacy coin adoption trends.

Environmental concerns that plagued Bitcoin also affect privacy coins, though less severely. Monero’s relatively modest energy consumption compared to Bitcoin positions it favorably. Sustainability is becoming a selection criterion.

This factor could influence anonymous cryptocurrency growth trajectories more than current market expansion analysis typically accounts for.

My personal prediction? Privacy coins will occupy a stable 2-3% of the total cryptocurrency market capitalization by 2030. That might sound modest, but it represents tens of billions in value supporting hundreds of thousands of daily users.

Not moon, not zero—sustainable growth serving real needs.

Statistics on Usage and Adoption

Let’s examine the actual data. Without hard numbers, we’re just guessing about privacy coin adoption. The cryptocurrency adoption metrics show something fascinating.

Privacy coins aren’t just niche tools for tech enthusiasts anymore. The user base has evolved considerably since 2020. What started as a movement dominated by privacy advocates has transformed into something broader.

Real people with real concerns about financial surveillance are choosing these technologies.

User Demographics and Trends

The stereotype about privacy coin users? Mostly wrong. I’ve watched the demographic shift happen over the past few years. It’s been eye-opening.

Geographic distribution tells the most compelling story. Privacy coins see significantly higher adoption in regions facing economic instability or authoritarian oversight. Venezuela, Argentina, and parts of Eastern Europe show adoption rates three to four times higher than North America or Western Europe.

Here’s what surprised me about age demographics. It’s not just young crypto enthusiasts driving adoption. Survey data from 2025-2026 shows users span all age groups fairly evenly.

• Ages 18-29: 28% of privacy coin users
• Ages 30-44: 35% of privacy coin users
• Ages 45-60: 24% of privacy coin users
• Ages 60+: 13% of privacy coin users

The use case patterns reveal even more nuance. People aren’t primarily using privacy coins for illicit purposes. That’s the narrative that regulators push, but the privacy coin statistics don’t support it.

The majority of transactions fall into legitimate categories. Merchant adoption has grown steadily. Industries where customer privacy matters—healthcare supplements, legal services, financial consulting—have started accepting privacy coins.

One survey found that 42% of privacy coin transactions in 2026 involved legitimate merchant purchases.

“The assumption that privacy coins only serve criminal purposes is both lazy and inaccurate. Our research shows that individuals seeking financial autonomy in unstable economic environments represent the largest user segment.”

Remittance payments represent another significant use case. Sending money to family in countries with currency controls creates challenges. Privacy coins offer advantages traditional services can’t match.

Lower fees, faster settlement, and protection from government seizure make them attractive.

Market Capitalization in 2026

Now for the hard numbers. The market capitalization data for privacy coins shows their position in the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. They’re not challenging Bitcoin or Ethereum for dominance, but they’ve carved out a sustainable niche.

Bitcoin trades around $102,000 and Ethereum near $3,300 in early 2026. The total cryptocurrency market cap sits above $3.2 trillion. Privacy coins represent approximately 1.2% of that total—small by percentage, but significant in absolute terms.

Trading volume matters more than market cap for assessing actual utility. A cryptocurrency people actively use has fundamentally different value than one sitting dormant in wallets. Privacy coins show healthy volume-to-market-cap ratios, indicating genuine usage rather than speculative holding.

Monero leads with the highest trading volume relative to its market cap—about 3.9% daily turnover. That suggests people are using Monero for transactions, not just holding it as a speculative asset.

The relationship between mainstream crypto success and privacy coin adoption isn’t straightforward. You’d think Bitcoin’s six-figure valuation would drive interest toward alternatives. Sometimes it does.

Mainstream crypto success validates the entire ecosystem and brings new users. These users then discover privacy options.

But there’s a countereffect too. Regulatory pressure intensifies when crypto gains mainstream acceptance. Privacy coins face delisting from major exchanges, banking restrictions, and increased scrutiny.

Several European exchanges removed privacy coins in 2024-2025 under regulatory pressure.

Despite these headwinds, the cryptocurrency adoption metrics show steady growth. Privacy coin transaction counts increased by 18% year-over-year from 2025 to 2026. Daily active addresses across major privacy coins grew by 23% during the same period.

Market share within the crypto ecosystem has remained relatively stable at 1-1.5% of total market capitalization. That consistency suggests privacy coins have found their audience. Not massive, but committed and growing organically.

Why Privacy in Cryptocurrency Matters

I’ve watched people dismiss financial privacy importance until their transaction history got leaked. Suddenly they understood why anonymity matters. The “I have nothing to hide” argument falls apart quickly.

You realize what your financial transactions actually reveal about your life. Privacy isn’t about criminal activity. It’s about maintaining basic human dignity in an increasingly monitored world.

Every Bitcoin transaction you make creates a permanent, public record. That might sound harmless until you consider what that record contains. Your transaction history isn’t just numbers—it’s a detailed map of your entire existence.

The Real Risks of Financial Transparency

Your blockchain transactions reveal where you shop and what you purchase. They show who you pay and when you travel. I’ve analyzed wallet addresses where you could identify someone’s medical conditions based on pharmacy payments.

Political affiliations emerge from donation patterns. Personal relationships appear through recurring transfers. That’s not theoretical—it happens constantly.

The crypto surveillance concerns extend far beyond government monitoring. Data breaches happen with frightening regularity. Exchanges get hacked, databases leak, and suddenly your complete financial history becomes available to criminals.

I’ve seen cases where people had their Bitcoin addresses linked to real identities. Once that connection exists, every transaction they ever made gets exposed and analyzed. Stalkers can track victims.

Thieves can identify wealthy targets. Competitors can analyze business transactions.

Transaction privacy protects you from these risks. Someone sends you cryptocurrency, they shouldn’t automatically gain access to your account balance. But with transparent blockchains, that’s exactly what happens.

Every incoming payment potentially exposes your entire financial life.

Financial surveillance creates comprehensive profiles without your consent. Marketing companies purchase blockchain analytics. Insurance providers assess risk based on spending patterns.

Employers research candidates’ transaction histories. This isn’t conspiracy theory—these services exist and operate openly today.

Financial Autonomy as a Fundamental Right

The philosophical case for monetary freedom goes deeper than practical security concerns. Privacy isn’t about enabling crime—it’s about preserving fundamental human rights in the digital age.

Cash has always been the preferred payment method for criminals. Yet we don’t ban cash currency. Society recognizes that financial freedom requires some level of privacy.

The same principle applies to cryptocurrency.

Financial surveillance enables discrimination in ways most people never consider. Banks deny services based on spending patterns. Merchants refuse customers who’ve transacted with disfavored entities.

Governments freeze assets of political dissidents without judicial oversight.

I’ve watched authoritarian regimes use financial monitoring to suppress opposition movements. Every transaction gets recorded and analyzed. Monetary freedom becomes impossible.

People can’t donate to causes they believe in. They can’t support organizations their government opposes. They can’t maintain financial autonomy.

The original cryptocurrency vision promised peer-to-peer electronic cash functioning outside institutional control. But transparent blockchains just created different middlemen. Blockchain analytics companies monitor and control transactions through identification and blacklisting.

True financial freedom demands transaction privacy. Without it, you’re simply replacing traditional banks with surveillance companies. The technology changes, but the fundamental power dynamic remains identical.

Consider how financial autonomy protects vulnerable populations. Domestic abuse victims need private finances to escape dangerous situations. Dissidents require anonymous transactions to organize safely.

Journalists depend on confidential payment channels to protect sources. Privacy serves legitimate, critical purposes.

The balance between transparency and privacy matters tremendously. Complete anonymity creates challenges for law enforcement. Complete transparency eliminates personal freedom.

Privacy coins attempt to navigate this tension by providing optional transparency. Transactions remain private by default. Users can selectively disclose information when legally required.

This isn’t paranoia or extremism. It’s acknowledging how power operates in practice. History repeatedly demonstrates that surveillance infrastructure gets abused, regardless of initial intentions.

Building financial systems with privacy as a foundational feature protects against both current and future threats to monetary freedom.

Tools for Enhancing Crypto Privacy

Using the right anonymous wallets, mixers, and exchanges changes how private your crypto activity is. Privacy coins like Monero offer built-in anonymity. Most cryptocurrency users still rely on Bitcoin or Ethereum for daily transactions.

That’s where crypto privacy tools become essential. Your privacy is only as strong as your weakest link. You could use the most sophisticated privacy coin available.

But if your wallet leaks your IP address, you’ve defeated the purpose. Trading through a centralized exchange that logs everything also ruins your privacy. The good news?

There are practical steps you can take right now. You can enhance your transaction privacy regardless of which cryptocurrency you’re using.

Cryptocurrency Mixers and Tumblers

Blockchain mixers serve one primary function: they break the connection between your sending and receiving addresses. Every Bitcoin transaction is permanently recorded on a public ledger. Anyone can trace where your coins came from and where they went.

Mixing services pool funds from multiple users and redistribute them. This makes it extremely difficult to track individual transactions. The most common implementation is called CoinJoin, where multiple users combine their payments.

Here’s how it works in practice. You send 1 BTC into a mixer along with dozens of other users. The service combines all these inputs and creates new outputs that go to recipients.

An outside observer can see funds entering and leaving. They can’t determine which input corresponds to which output.

There are two main types of blockchain mixers to consider. Centralized mixers require you to trust the service operator with your funds temporarily. You send coins to their address, and they send different coins back.

The risk? The operator could steal your funds or log transaction data despite privacy claims. Authorities could compel them to reveal records.

Decentralized protocols like Wasabi Wallet or Samourai Whirlpool eliminate the trust requirement. These anonymous wallets implement CoinJoin directly, coordinating transactions between users. No central party ever controls the funds.

Mixers don’t provide the same privacy guarantees as native privacy coins. Sophisticated blockchain analysis can sometimes de-anonymize mixed transactions, especially without best practices. The mixing process also takes time and incurs fees, typically 1-3% of the transaction amount.

Regulatory pressure has increased dramatically on mixer services. Some jurisdictions now treat them as money transmission businesses, requiring licensing and compliance. In 2022 and 2023, several high-profile mixers were shut down by law enforcement.

This trend has continued into 2026. Operators now face legal consequences for facilitating anonymous transactions.

Decentralized Exchanges

Centralized exchanges represent the biggest privacy vulnerability for most cryptocurrency users. Signing up for Coinbase, Kraken, or Binance requires government identification and proof of address. This process creates a permanent record linking your identity to your crypto addresses.

That’s exactly why privacy-conscious users turn to decentralized exchanges. DEXs allow peer-to-peer trading without intermediaries collecting your personal information.

Bisq operates as a desktop application that connects buyers and sellers directly. There’s no company running the exchange and no accounts to create. You maintain control of your funds throughout the entire trading process.

LocalMonero specializes in privacy coin trading. It connects people who want to buy or sell Monero using various payment methods. The platform facilitates the connection, but the actual exchange happens directly between users.

Newer atomic swap protocols enable trustless cross-chain trading without any platform. You can exchange Bitcoin for Monero directly with another user. The swap either completes fully or cancels completely.

No middleman, no custody risk, no identity verification. The tradeoff is convenience. DEXs are generally slower than centralized exchanges.

Liquidity is lower, meaning you might not find a buyer or seller immediately. The user interface requires more technical knowledge than mainstream platforms. But for privacy, avoiding centralized exchanges is crucial.

That’s where most privacy breaches occur. Hacked or subpoenaed exchanges expose your trading history and linked addresses. DEXs eliminate this single point of failure entirely.

Privacy-focused Wallets

Your wallet choice determines how much metadata you leak with every transaction. Standard wallets connect to blockchain networks using your real IP address. They reveal your geographic location.

They often link all your addresses together, making it easy to calculate your total balance. Some even send transaction data through third-party servers that log everything.

Privacy-focused wallets implement specific features to prevent these leaks. Tor integration routes all network traffic through the Tor anonymity network. This hides your IP address from blockchain nodes and potential surveillance.

This single feature dramatically improves your privacy posture. Coin control gives you manual selection over which specific coins to spend. Why does this matter?

Bitcoin and similar cryptocurrencies work with distinct “coin” outputs from previous transactions. Spending from several sources simultaneously links those addresses together publicly.

With coin control, you can deliberately select which coins to spend. This keeps different identities or activities separated. It’s like having separate cash envelopes for different purposes.

Several anonymous wallets stand out for privacy-conscious users. Monero GUI is the official wallet for Monero, implementing all the protocol’s privacy features. Cake Wallet supports multiple privacy coins on mobile devices, making anonymous transactions accessible.

Hardware wallets like Trezor and Ledger have added privacy features in recent years. They still lag behind software solutions designed specifically for anonymity. The advantage is security—your private keys never leave the device.

The disadvantage is that connecting them to your computer can still leak metadata. Here’s the principle: your privacy is only as strong as your weakest link. Using a privacy coin with a wallet that broadcasts your IP address defeats the purpose.

Trading on a DEX but withdrawing to an address you’ve used on KYC exchanges defeats the purpose. Mixing your Bitcoin but depositing directly to a regulated exchange defeats the purpose.

Privacy requires a holistic approach, combining multiple crypto privacy tools into a comprehensive strategy.

The landscape of crypto privacy tools continues evolving. Developers respond to both user needs and regulatory pressures. What worked perfectly in 2023 might be compromised or shut down by 2026.

That’s why staying informed and diversifying your privacy approach matters. Relying on any single solution isn’t enough. Implementing these tools requires effort and learning.

The alternative is accepting that your financial activity is permanently public and traceable. For many users, that tradeoff is worth making. The question isn’t whether these crypto privacy tools are perfect—they’re not.

The question is whether the privacy they provide is sufficient. Consider your specific needs and threat model.

Legislative Landscape Impacting Privacy Coins

Privacy coins sit at the center of debate between lawmakers and crypto advocates. The regulatory environment in 2026 has become more defined than before. Privacy-preserving cryptocurrencies exist where innovation collides with government demands for financial transparency.

The challenge isn’t just about following rules. It’s about understanding how privacy coin legislation shapes what you can do with these assets. Regulatory frameworks directly impact your experience as a user.

This landscape changes constantly. What’s true today might shift tomorrow based on court decisions or new enforcement priorities. Staying informed matters more than memorizing current rules.

Where Privacy Coins Stand Under U.S. Law

The United States hasn’t banned privacy coins outright, which surprises some people. Owning and using Monero, Zcash, or similar cryptocurrencies remains legal for U.S. citizens as of 2026. Legal compliance gets complicated when you look at how different agencies approach these assets.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network treats privacy coins like any other cryptocurrency for anti-money laundering purposes. Exchanges and businesses handling these coins must register as money service businesses. They need to implement Know Your Customer procedures and report suspicious transactions.

Here’s where it gets tricky. Privacy coins make transaction monitoring nearly impossible by design. That fundamental characteristic puts them at odds with the Bank Secrecy Act’s requirements.

The IRS expects you to report all cryptocurrency transactions regardless of privacy features. Capital gains, losses, and income from privacy coins must appear on your tax returns. Enforcement becomes difficult when transaction histories aren’t publicly visible on a blockchain.

Major U.S. exchanges have increasingly delisted privacy coins under regulatory pressure. Coinbase, Kraken, and others removed Monero and similar assets from their platforms. This wasn’t due to explicit legal requirements but rather risk management decisions.

The delistings create practical barriers for average users. You can still acquire privacy coins through decentralized exchanges or peer-to-peer transactions. But the extra steps discourage casual adoption and push activity into less regulated channels.

Recent enforcement actions reveal regulatory priorities. The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctioned cryptocurrency mixers like Tornado Cash in previous years. The actions signal government concern about privacy-preserving technologies in general.

Financial institutions face pressure to avoid privacy coins entirely. Banks have closed accounts for customers conducting large privacy coin transactions. This happens even though the transactions themselves weren’t illegal.

What’s Coming Down the Pipeline

Several proposed changes could reshape how privacy coins operate. Congress has discussed enhanced Know Your Customer requirements for self-hosted wallets. These proposals would require users to verify their identity even when using non-custodial solutions.

Some lawmakers have introduced bills specifically targeting privacy-preserving technologies. These range from disclosure requirements to potential outright bans on certain privacy features. None have passed as of 2026, but the conversations continue.

The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation took effect. MiCA mandates transparency standards that conflict with core privacy coin features. European exchanges face difficult choices about continuing to support these assets.

This creates a patchwork situation globally. Different jurisdictions take different approaches to cryptocurrency regulations. Japan, South Korea, and Australia have each developed their own frameworks with varying degrees of privacy coin friendliness.

The concern isn’t just about what regulations say on paper. It’s about how they get implemented in practice. Overly broad rules could criminalize legitimate privacy-seeking behavior.

The philosophical tension here runs deep. Governments want visibility into financial flows to combat crime and collect taxes. Individuals want control over their personal financial information.

Banning privacy technology doesn’t eliminate it. History shows that prohibition pushes activities underground without solving underlying issues. Users who want privacy will find ways to achieve it through privacy coins, mixers, or future innovations.

Regulations will continue constraining privacy coins, making them harder to use through traditional channels. But technology typically outpaces regulation. New privacy solutions emerge faster than governments can address them.

For users, the key takeaway is simple: understand your local legal requirements. Don’t assume privacy features exempt you from tax reporting or other legal obligations. Privacy and legal compliance aren’t mutually exclusive, but they require careful navigation.

The regulatory environment will likely tighten before it loosens. More jurisdictions will implement MiCA-style frameworks. Exchanges will face pressure to delist or restrict privacy coins.

Yet privacy coins serve legitimate purposes beyond criminal activity. Journalists, activists, and ordinary people have valid reasons to seek financial privacy. The challenge is creating privacy coin legislation that addresses genuine concerns without eliminating beneficial use cases.

FAQs About Anonymous Cryptocurrencies

People often ask me two questions about privacy coins. What makes these coins truly private? Can I get in trouble for using them? These cryptocurrency anonymity questions come up constantly and deserve clear answers.

The confusion is understandable. Privacy in blockchain involves technical concepts. Most explanations either oversimplify or make them unnecessarily complicated.

I’ve watched the privacy coin space evolve over nearly a decade. The questions haven’t changed much. The answers have gotten more nuanced as regulations develop and technology improves.

Let me walk you through what you need to know. This is anonymous crypto explained in practical terms, not marketing hype.

What Makes a Cryptocurrency Truly Anonymous?

True anonymity requires hiding four critical pieces of information. These include sender identity, receiver identity, transaction amount, and transaction history. Bitcoin fails on all four counts.

Every Bitcoin transaction is permanently visible on the blockchain. The addresses are traceable.

The technology behind anonymous cryptocurrencies varies significantly. Monero uses ring signatures, stealth addresses, and RingCT. These features obscure all transaction details by default.

Zcash employs zero-knowledge proofs called zk-SNARKs. These enable shielded transactions where you prove validity without revealing details. The catch? Zcash makes privacy optional, and most users don’t activate it.

Here’s something most people miss. There’s a crucial distinction between anonymity and pseudonymity. Bitcoin is pseudonymous.

You have consistent identifiers called addresses. These aren’t directly linked to your real identity. However, they can be traced through blockchain analysis.

Anonymity means no one can determine who you are. No one can link your transactions together. That’s a much higher bar.

Achieving complete anonymity requires more than just technology. Your behavior matters enormously. You need to acquire coins privately.

Use them through secure connections like Tor. Avoid linking addresses through reuse or common ownership patterns.

I’ve seen people compromise their privacy through careless mistakes. This happens even when using the best privacy coins available. They’ll buy Monero on an exchange that requires ID verification.

Then they wonder why their privacy isn’t absolute.

The blockchain privacy technology enables anonymity. Your operational security determines whether you actually achieve it. Think of it like having a secure safe.

The safe works. But if you write the combination on a sticky note, the technology doesn’t matter.

“Privacy is not about hiding wrongdoing. Privacy is about protecting normal behavior from becoming a data point in someone else’s business model or surveillance operation.”

Here’s what genuine transaction privacy requires in practice:

• Acquisition through private methods that don’t link your identity to the coins
• Using privacy-focused wallets that don’t leak metadata
• Running transactions through networks like Tor or I2P to hide your IP address
• Avoiding address reuse and maintaining strict separation between different activities
• Understanding that privacy is probabilistic, not absolute—you’re raising the cost of surveillance, not making it impossible

The degrees of anonymity matter more than most marketing materials acknowledge. Monero provides strong default privacy. It requires significant resources to potentially compromise.

Zcash with shielded transactions offers comparable protection. But only when you use those features. The majority of Zcash transactions remain transparent.

Bitcoin with CoinJoin or mixing services provides weak anonymity. Sophisticated blockchain analysis can often defeat it.

Are Anonymous Cryptocurrencies Legal to Use?

Short answer: yes, privacy coin legality remains clear in most jurisdictions. This includes the United States. Owning and using privacy coins is completely legal.

Privacy itself is not a crime. We have physical cash because society recognizes the need for private transactions.

The longer answer involves important nuances. While ownership is legal, using privacy coins for illegal purposes isn’t. This is just like with cash or any other payment method.

Some exchanges have delisted privacy coins. This makes acquisition harder but not illegal. Regulatory uncertainty means the situation could evolve.

Current law doesn’t prohibit privacy coins.

I need to emphasize something that gets lost in discussions. Privacy tools are morally neutral. They enable both legitimate privacy protection and potentially illicit use.

But banning privacy technology because criminals might use it doesn’t make sense. That would be equivalent to banning encryption, secure messaging, or cash itself.

The practical legal considerations you actually need to worry about:

• Tax obligations remain in force regardless of blockchain privacy—document your transactions for tax purposes even if the blockchain doesn’t reveal them
• Know your local regulations, as some countries have stricter approaches than the United States
• Don’t assume privacy coins make you untouchable if you’re engaging in illegal activities—law enforcement has other investigation methods
• Exchange delistings create practical acquisition challenges but don’t change the legal status

The regulatory landscape for anonymous cryptocurrencies continues evolving. Some lawmakers have proposed restrictions. They’re concerned about potential illicit use.

But as of 2026, no broad prohibition exists in the United States.

Financial privacy advocates argue that privacy is a fundamental right. It shouldn’t require justification. You don’t need to explain why you want financial privacy.

Just like you don’t need to explain why you close the bathroom door.

Here’s my practical advice based on years of using privacy coins. Treat them like any other financial instrument. Keep records for tax purposes.

Understand that privacy protects you from mass surveillance and data breaches. It doesn’t protect you from targeted law enforcement investigations if you’re breaking laws.

Use privacy coins because you value financial privacy as a principle. Not because you’re trying to hide illegal activity. The distinction matters both legally and ethically.

The questions around cryptocurrency anonymity questions often reveal a fundamental misunderstanding. People sometimes assume that wanting privacy implies wrongdoing.

That’s backwards.

Privacy is the default state for financial transactions throughout human history. It’s only in the last few decades that complete financial transparency became possible. This happened through digital surveillance.

Privacy coins restore what we’ve always had. They give us the ability to conduct transactions without creating permanent public records. That’s not radical or suspicious.

It’s normal.

Guide to Investing in Anonymous Cryptocurrencies

Privacy coin investment requires homework and careful evaluation. Buying anonymous cryptocurrencies differs from mainstream exchanges. You must understand different technology, accept higher risks, and navigate complex landscapes.

Many people jump into privacy coins based on hype alone. They discover their “private” coin doesn’t deliver real anonymity.

The challenge involves more than picking which coin to buy. You must understand what makes one privacy project legitimate and another just marketing noise.

You need an evaluation framework beyond price charts and social media buzz. Once you know what to look for, separating genuine innovations becomes straightforward.

How to Evaluate a Privacy Coin

I ask one simple question about any privacy project: what specific technology provides anonymity? This matters more than any other factor. Some coins claim privacy but use outdated or easily defeated methods.

Start by examining the privacy mechanism itself. Does the coin use ring signatures like Monero? Does it use zero-knowledge proofs like Zcash?

The technology should be peer-reviewed and battle-tested. New, unproven cryptography sounds exciting but often contains vulnerabilities. Researchers discover these problems later.

Next, determine whether privacy is mandatory or optional. This distinction proves critical. Zcash offers shielded transactions, but most users stick with transparent ones.

Transparent transactions are easier and cheaper. Optional privacy creates a smaller anonymity set. Those who use privacy features stand out more.

Mandatory privacy, like Monero implements, protects every transaction equally. You can’t accidentally compromise yourself by choosing the wrong option.

Consider Verge (XVG) as an example where marketing exceeds reality. Verge uses Tor and I2P networks to hide your IP address. That’s useful for network-level privacy.

Here’s the problem: transaction amounts and addresses remain visible on the blockchain. Anyone analyzing the Verge blockchain sees exactly how much you sent. They also see where it went.

That’s not secure digital currencies. That’s just IP obfuscation with regular blockchain transparency.

Compare that to newer projects like Grin and Beam. They use the Mimblewimble protocol. This approach provides transaction privacy while improving scalability through smaller blockchain size.

The technology represents a different tradeoff. You get strong privacy with technical complexity. This makes wallet software harder to use.

Your evaluation framework should include these additional criteria:

• Development team and community: Active development signals ongoing improvements and bug fixes
• Decentralization metrics: Check mining distribution, node count, and governance structure
• Adoption indicators: Transaction volume, merchant acceptance, exchange availability
• Regulatory risk assessment: Stronger privacy typically means greater regulatory pressure

I always look at actual usage data, not just promises. How many transactions happen daily? Are exchanges delisting the coin due to regulatory pressure?

Is the development community addressing vulnerabilities promptly? These questions reveal the truth about privacy coins.

The table below outlines key evaluation criteria across different privacy coin characteristics:

Not every coin claiming privacy actually delivers it. Some projects just slap “private” in their name. They implement basic mixing that blockchain analysis firms defeat in minutes.

Your job as an investor is cutting through that noise. Use objective technical evaluation.

Tips for Safe Trading and Storage

Acquiring secure digital currencies requires different approaches than buying mainstream crypto. Many major exchanges don’t list privacy coins due to regulatory concerns. That forces you toward alternative acquisition methods.

Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) offer the most private purchase option. You’re not providing identity documents or linking transactions to your real name. The tradeoff includes lower liquidity and sometimes higher fees.

Peer-to-peer trading platforms let you buy directly from other individuals. This works well for larger amounts. It requires careful vetting of counterparties to avoid scams.

Some centralized exchanges still list privacy coins. Just understand that your purchase creates a record. This record links your identity to that transaction.

Once you’ve acquired privacy coins, crypto storage security becomes your next priority. Hardware wallets provide the strongest protection for long-term holdings. These physical devices keep your private keys offline.

Not all hardware wallets support every privacy coin. Check compatibility before purchasing. Ledger and Trezor support Monero and Zcash.

For coins without hardware wallet support, paper wallets offer an alternative. You’re printing your private keys and storing them physically. This works, but introduces new risks.

Whatever storage method you choose, backup procedures prove absolutely critical. Privacy coins don’t help if you lose access to your funds. Write down your seed phrase on paper—not digitally.

Store it in multiple secure locations.

I recommend the following crypto storage security practices:

1. Never store seed phrases digitally or in cloud services
2. Use metal backup plates for fire and water resistance
3. Test your backup by restoring a small amount first
4. Split backups across multiple physical locations
5. Never photograph or screenshot your seed phrase

Operational security extends beyond just wallet protection. Using Tor when accessing wallet software prevents your IP address from being associated. Avoiding address reuse makes chain analysis harder.

Generate a new receiving address for each transaction.

Never reveal your holdings publicly. The most secure digital currencies can’t protect you from physical threats. This applies if someone knows you hold significant value.

Privacy coins present unique challenges compared to mainstream options. They’re harder to buy on major exchanges. Transaction fees often run higher due to computational overhead.

Wallet options remain more limited. You’ll find fewer mobile and desktop choices.

These inconveniences represent the price of genuine financial privacy. You’re trading convenience for control and anonymity. Whether that tradeoff makes sense depends on your specific needs.

Start small and learn through experience with privacy coin investment. Buy a small amount and practice sending and receiving transactions. Test your backup procedures and familiarize yourself with the technology.

Do this before committing significant funds. Theory matters less than hands-on understanding. Your financial privacy depends on getting the details right.

Evidence and Sources to Consider

I’ve spent years digging through cryptocurrency privacy research. The landscape changes constantly. Privacy represents an ongoing arms race between developers and analysts.

The Monero Research Lab publishes regular studies on timing analysis attacks and countermeasures. I check their work quarterly because yesterday’s bulletproof privacy sometimes has vulnerabilities discovered today.

The Zcash Foundation funds independent blockchain analysis studies. These examine anonymity set sizes and transaction patterns. These organizations don’t just market their coins—they actively test weaknesses.

Academic Analysis and Technical Papers

Universities conduct serious research on privacy mechanisms. Studies analyzing CoinJoin implementations reveal both strengths and limitations. Academic papers examine whether privacy coins actually get used for illicit activities.

Bitcoin still dominates crypto crime because of liquidity.

Ongoing Expert Commentary

Bitcoin Magazine covers privacy developments with technical depth. The Monero Talk podcast features interviews with developers and researchers. These experts understand the actual mechanics behind privacy technology.

Expert privacy opinions vary wildly. Some maximalists dismiss anything weaker than Monero. Other skeptics question regulatory compatibility.

I’ve learned to distinguish informed technical analysis from marketing hype. Developers working directly on privacy protocols provide more value than influencer hot takes. Read researchers who’ve actually analyzed blockchain privacy.

Cross-reference multiple sources before trusting any single perspective.

Privacy technology evolves. What works today might face new challenges tomorrow. Staying informed through credible sources helps you make better decisions about anonymous cryptocurrencies.